Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
628-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

628-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023117 50.880950)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023046 50.880942,-1.023050 50.880956,-1.023059 50.880969,-1.023075 50.880979,-1.023095 50.880986,-1.023116 50.880988,-1.023138 50.880986,-1.023158 50.880980,-1.023174 50.880970,-1.023185 50.880957,-1.023188 50.880944,-1.023185 50.880930,-1.023175 50.880917,-1.023160 50.880907,-1.023140 50.880900,-1.023118 50.880898,-1.023096 50.880900,-1.023076 50.880906,-1.023060 50.880916,-1.023050 50.880929,-1.023046 50.880942)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL